What The Existence Of Incels Tell Us About The Left-Right Political spectrum
Why Incels Should Be Leftists and probably are.
The Left-Right Political spectrum is a lense with which one can view politics in a simplified manner, mostly concerned with the means by which political phenomenon's achieve social and economical progress for the people. Yes, even conservativism is occupied with progress. The progress of the time, achieved by certain means of the past that they intend to preserve, whilst judging suspiciously every action that tries to tear down the traditions of the past, for further inclusion of people, most times, not because they don't want more people sharing in the wealth, resources, beauty, etc., of the top one percenters, but because it would severe the means of achieving progress in itself—although it can very usually be the other way around.
However today I am not going to discuss that, atleast not that in itself( I am sick of doing it because I am not American, but a third worlder that is usually exposed to and involved in Western politics against my will, in a way unusual to how other third worlders are exposed to and involved in it). Today I am going to talk about what the existence of Incels tell us about the Left-Right Political spectrum.
Incels, a term I have discussed far too many times than I deem comfortable, is the word used to refer to people who are unable to achieve relationships with the opposite sex for various reasons. Typically, I would say the word is not supposed to exist. For the people who identify as Incels can get sex from soliciting prostitutes, but they don't do so for voluntary reasons. Because what they want are long lasting relationships with women and are unable to do that. Not mere sex. But we know who we are referring to when we call someone an Incel. The men who actually identify by the name and cause much problems on the internet and sometimes in real life.
The focal point of Incels is that they are unable to get intimate partners of the other sex, and so resent the world and mostly women for this. They have no real standard political goal in itself, but from their rhetorics they want a world where they can get all the intimacy and sex they want, and do not have to go through all the trials and tribulations in order to get it.
Incels subscribe to Redpill ideology. A view of human sexual relationships and interactions that is so reminiscent of Marxism and Darwinism that it is hard to see how anyone would miss it. Redpill ideology strips away all beauty and aesthetics of sexual interactions, conventions, and traditions that have been prevalent, and shows a carcass, a market place where sexual attractiveness and the ability to pass of one's genes are the ultimate selling card.
In Redpill ideology, there is something called the sexual market, and everyone has a sexual market value. Men and women are the participants of this sexual market. And like a market, there is the principle of demand and supply. Men and women supply, men and women demand. Men demand sex, intimacy, beauty, fertility, etc., Women demand protection, loyalty, chivalry, and security, physical looks etc.
The more a person has what is demanded, the higher they ascend the hierarchy of the sexual market. And the people who have less of what is demanded, are low in the hierarchy. The Redpill sees a power imbalance between men and women—atleast in present time—men demand from women, qualities that are readily available, and women demand more from men, in qualities that are not nearly as available, and in only a few men whom Incels refer to as Chads. So because this leaves quite a number or men in desperate need of sex and intimacy, it gives birth to some form of gynocentricism that the Redpillers call the Feminine Imperative. Nowadays they refer to this Feminine Imperative as part of the Matrix, and anyone who is able to see it has broken out of the Matrix and achieved some form of enlightenment.
Redpillers view the ascension of pathriachy in most human societies as a means to mitigate this Feminine Imperative. Where does this put Incels? At the end of the barrel. There are essentially, in the sense of the Sexual Market in comparison with the real life material market, the poor and homeless.
Now Why Are Incels Not Left Wing, Even Though They Should Be?
The Left Wing is the area of the political spectrum that is concerned with inclusivity, fraternity, globalism, and broader humanity, in broad terms. They are concerned with the rights of the poor, women, victims, sexual and ethnic minorities, and workers, etc. Incels are the bottom barrel of the sexual heirachy, and consider themselves, to be virtually unlikable and oppressed by the Chads and Stacies who have more sexual appeal and exploit the sexual market—more so women especially exploit men and make them do things by making conventions that serve them in their favor. This Marxist oppressive view of inequality is the back bone of the resentment of the Incels towards the sexually successful. So why are Incels not percieved as Left Wing but seen as Right Wing.
For one, it is not in particular a person's predicament that makes them Right or Left Wing. There are so many White, Rich, Masculine Men that are left wing in view, just as they are also Black, Trans, Gay, Men and Women that are Right Wing. To the best of my knowledge the leader of AFD Far Right party of Germany is a Lesbian woman, Alice Weidel, who has been in a relationship with a Sri Lankan woman named Sarah Bossard for a long time now. I myself would have a fat share of Intersectional Privilege if I ever show up to the west identifying as a Black African immigrant that is on the autistic spectrum and has ADHD. But I however find it repulsive (for good or for worse) to be identified solely by my "ills and troubles" as though it makes me special in anyway. Victimhood repulses me. And I believe hard core smart Right Wing policies are especially what my nation needs right now. To hell with the west.
What identifies one's place in the political spectrum is their idea on how their predicaments could be rid of. And what exactly are Incel solutions to their problems? Here are a few I can mention.
1) Game/Pick up artistry.
Pick up artists are generally not Incels, they just share a space with them on the Manosphere. And truth be told, a lot of Incels actually loathe pick up artists who try to teach them game, as previledged folk who want to sell them a dream that can never be achieved. But many still do transition to pick up artists. Pick up artistry is the art of manipulating women, one way or another, into falling for them so they can have their way. They use tricks, looks, psychological maneuvering, Robert Greene's laws of attraction to game women. And as you can imagine it is very unpopular with women, who are a large demography in Leftistism, and see it as not so different from rape. So this is no Leftism.
2) Self Improvement.
This would come off as a low blow, but I find that a lot of Leftists are not particularly fond of self improvement as an advice for their problems. It is particularly why when Jordan Peterson told Incels to clean their rooms and not make their problems other people's problems, how they should arrange their lives before trying to fix the world, how they should have accountability for themselves, it was better taken by them than it was taken by the people in that aforementioned end of the spectrum whose entire political ideology is based on the opposite of the very things he said. Many Incels self improve, many don't still.
3) Shooting and killing the people you think caused your problem in the first place.
You know, this is confusing for me too. I mean it is actually leftist tradition to execute and eat the rich. Why is it then such a bad thing that a man that has been oppressed for such a long time decides to kill the people who have been oppressing him? It makes no sense except you understand intersectionality. Incels kill women and perhaps other leftist men that are oppressed by the pathriachal, capitalistic, cisnormative, white society. So Eliot Rodger, is castigated, while Luigi Mangione who killed Brian Thomson, a super rich C.E.O who has been oppressing the poor and deserves to be killed and eaten, is celebrated.
4) Reversionalism
A lot of Incels want the world reversed to a time before feminism and the sexual revolution, where marriage and sex were sacred, and women covered up, were Christian, and did not go to work, and had no financial liberty. It was easier to get married because the society allowed for women to need men as much as men needed women, leading to a balance of the sexual market. Leftists are not a huge fan of this as well.
5) Become Leftists
Parade themselves as male feminists—virtue signaling how much they think fat black women are beautiful and strong, how trans women are women, how we should believe all women, and in very curious cases, they become trans themselves. This could actually work, and when it does you would not guesss the person was an Incel, hence one the reasons Incels are not percieved as leftists, because when Incels are leftists, despite that their predicaments and behavior actually match in a sexual sense the profile of the communist, it would be impossible to know. Incels are sex communists, in every sense of the word. Being Leftist is the ultimate cover up.
A world without the rich, a world where we are equal in every sense, would strap down any market that parades values like the sexual market, hence they would be no need for beauty and physical attractiveness. They would be nothing. Nothing would inspire man to do anything, because he would lack his sense of value, in rank and file, in hierarchy.
To the average mind, Incels are right wing, because the ones who boldly proclaim themselves to be Incels pick right wing methods to cure their ills. But how would anyone know, if in left wing circles, they are men who lack the physical touch of a woman, conniving, plotting, for a more equal world, where the rich doesn't exist, and there would be no need for physical attraction because there would be such thing as ugliness, and body positivity has finally won, and so every ugly trait is now mandated to be seen as beautiful and human, intelligence is now not needed, social skills, irrelevant, chads and stacies, non existent.
What does this reveal about The Left-Ri
ght Political spectrum? That all of it is cope.